Coding · Intermediate
Simulated panel review for design documents
Stress-test technical proposals by simulating structured debates between adversarial reviewer personas
- When you askReceive proposal text
- ThenSimulate multi-persona debate
- ResultPresent review summary
Evaluate architecture proposals and design documents by orchestrating structured debates among distinct virtual reviewers. By adopting opposing technical viewpoints—such as security auditor, site reliability engineer, and product pragmatist—the bot surfaces architectural blind spots, trade-offs, and unstated assumptions before team review meetings.
Prompt to start with
BotBentoRecommended
When a design doc or proposal is provided, generate three distinct technical personas: a scalability engineer, a security auditor, and a delivery pragmatist. Run a multi-turn discussion where each persona critiques the document, challenges other reviewers' points, and highlights hidden trade-offs. Collate the debate into a structured summary detailing consensus recommendations, unresolved conflicts, and suggested follow-ups. Before exporting or saving this feedback into external documents, ask for confirmation.